my love !!!!!! my cat !!!! lol

its name is maky it is a (beautiful) cat i the world
it's still study in the high school
it play with guitar .....lol
it has a girl friend
it live in the seven heaven with its princees
it is a smart cat it can play with ball and write its name !!!!!!!!!!????lol

any way i really love it
but as sinousa said !!
you can to love an animals than your self .....but you won't respect them
you can to love a mountains than your self .....but you won't respect them
so you have to love ..........who can love you too

# Posté le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 05:55

Modifié le mardi 08 janvier 2008 20:37

loitering of young boys

loitering of young boys
No, No, No--What Else is a Parent to Say?
The following parenting article offers a colorful glimpse into life with young boys and the creative parenting that sometimes becomes necessary.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by Michele R. Acosta

The word no is probably the most overused word in the English language. I speak from experience since I myself use it frequently.

I might begin a normal day by saying, "No, Joshua, you may not have a hotdog for breakfast," or "No, Alex, please don't throw your cereal on the floor." After breakfast, I might say, "No, Joshua, don't hit your brother," or "No, Alex, don't kick your brother."

The word no is probably the most overused word in the English language. I speak from experience since I myself use it frequently.

I might begin a normal day by saying, "No, Joshua, you may not have a hotdog for breakfast," or "No, Alex, please don't throw your cereal on the floor." After breakfast, I might say, "No, Joshua, don't hit your brother," or "No, Alex, don't kick your brother."

While I'm making lunch, I usually need to tell Alex, "No, you cannot climb onto the kitchen table." By early afternoon, which is the time of day I set aside for my work, I usually find myself telling Joshua, "No, you cannot wake Alex from his nap" or "No! Don't touch Mommy's computer!"

By late afternoon, I find myself saying either one or a combination of the following: "No, you cannot climb on the dresser"; "No, you cannot sit on the dresser"; "No, you cannot jump off of the dresser."



Articles

Education Articles
Literary Criticism

Isolation: Hawthorne v. Melville

Parenting Articles
No, No, No -- What Else is a Parent to Say?
On Writing
Starting a Freelance Writing Career (or Thoughts About Taking the Plunge
Starting a Freelance Writing Career (or How I Sifted through the Muck and Found My Way)
Reading in a Tree
Action Research
Introduction: Multiple Intelligences
Method
Results
Discussion
Conclusions



By early evening my repertoire usually includes, "No, boys, you cannot crash your cars into the walls" and "No, Alex, you cannot eat the cookie you've dropped on the floor. No! You can't take the dirty cookie out of the garbage!" On any given day, by the time my sons are securely tucked into their beds and are soundly sleeping - that can be anywhere from 8:00 until 11:00 - I have probably used the word no at least one-hundred times.

No has little value in our household, which I look upon as a microcosm of the world at large. People habitually ignore signs saying: no parking, no smoking, or no loitering. Last night, I watched a man park his car in a parking place reserved for the handicapped. Although the car had a handicapped parking permit displayed properly, none of the four people who emerged from the car had any visible handicap.

People generally look upon an answer of no as a challenge. Romantic movies are filled with plots in which the guy doesn't give up until he gets the girl and they live happily ever after. If so many adults fail to respond to the word no, then how can I expect anything different from two small children? The answer is that I cannot expect anything different, yet breaking the "no habit" is a difficult prospect.

With such blatant overuse, the word no has obviously lost its meaning; at least it has lost its meaning for my sons. The more often I say no, the less often my sons respond to it; it is as if a viscous circle has taken over the discipline in our household. If I had not already recognized the overuse of this two-letter-word which has invaded my home, I would have been startled when Alex, my almost-two-year-old son, began saying, "No-no-no. No-no-no." He has even been known to chant "no-no-no, no-no-no," while walking through the house with a cup of juice. I console myself with the thought that he at least understands that juice does not belong outside of the kitchen.

I find this to be a very difficult situation. With boys like mine, I cannot sit idly by waiting for a witty response to hit me in the face. It is more likely that they will hit each other in the face - or somewhere else. My greatest concern is that one day they will be in a dangerous situation (thinking, of course, that they are having great fun) and that my warnings will go unheeded because no has no meaning for them. Not that jumping off of dressers and climbing on tables are not potentially dangerous situations; this is the reason why I do not waste time on brilliantly creative responses which would satisfy the gurus of child psychology before mobilizing into action. It simply seems that climbing and jumping are commonplace occurrences in my house. In retrospect, it is easy to tell myself that I should have been more creative in formulating responses to my sons' exuberance and zest for life; however, in the midst of two boys rolling on the floor with legs and arms flailing, the word closest at hand is usually: No!

I have attempted to extricate myself from this circle in which no resembles yes more than it resembles itself. I have tried laughing; they laughed with me as they jumped from the fourth step of the stair case. I have tried getting on the floor and rolling around with them; they pinned me down and Alex almost choked me as he tried to climb on my back for a piggy-back-ride. At that moment, I again reverted to humor saying to my son, "Alex, you are an instigator. Do you know what that means?" He threw his arms up in the air and yelled, "Fun!"

I have tried to curb my use of the word no by curbing my sons' activities. My attempts at discipline have included giving time-outs, sending them to their rooms, and putting them in corners. These methods seemed to have some immediate value, but only until the next time. I even tried to instill more meaning in the word no by saying very seriously, "No means no!" I have to admit that I have been reduced to this innocuous statement more often than once.

There are times when I simply let chaos reign. I listen closely for the danger signals and intervene only if and when I hear them. I can also count on Joshua, who recently turned four, to tattle. It's wonderful because he even tattles on himself.

Recently, I ignored all of the thuds and booms that I heard coming from the toy room. I even ignored the cries and screams since none lasted for more than a few seconds. Eventually, Joshua came downstairs to tell me that Alex was in the bathroom taking everything out of the cabinet. I walked up the stairs, expecting to find towels strewn about. Instead, I found Alex standing on the vanity removing all of the medicine from the medicine cabinet. Joshua, who had followed me up the stairs, left the bathroom and returned a few moments later with a large bottle of children's cough medicine and a small bottle of syrup of ipecac that he had found in Alex's bedroom.

Somehow, no did not pack enough power to deal with the situation, so I immediately purchased safety locks for the bathroom and laundry room doors. That eliminated several instances of no per day.

Since I cannot remove all of the furniture from my house, and since I cannot alter my sons' perception of the word no (any more than I can stop my brother from parking illegally downtown), I must continue my search for other successful methods of eliminating no from my vocabulary. The tactic that usually works best with any child is patience; although, it is difficult to be patient when your children are perpetually black and blue, so I must use patience cautiously when jumping and climbing are involved. There are, however, plenty of other occasions in which the word no surfaces in my house. On these occasions, it is my goal to find another response to the situations which arise. So the next time I catch Alex eating Vaseline, before groaning or screeching - No! - I'll have to take a deep breath and say, "Alex, are you hungry?"

If I can successfully reduce these instances of the word no in my vocabulary, I hope that, with age, my sons will eventually learn that no does have a meaning. Until that time arrives, I am left with several years of holding my breath every time I hear Joshua say, "Alex, let's jump!" In the meantime, I have stocked up on Dalmatian Band-Aids and Bactine.

# Posté le dimanche 16 septembre 2007 18:42

Modifié le lundi 17 septembre 2007 00:08

don't rape

don't rape
Hailing Supreme Court Decision
June 7, 1994


Supreme Court Hailed for "Historic Breakthrough" in Prison Rape Decision


The president of the national organization Stop Prisoner Rape (SPR) today hailed the U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous decision yesterday in Farmer v. Brennan (argued January 12) as a "historic breakthrough" in attempts to end what it called "the widespread and institutionalized practice of rape of prisoners." The 15-year-old group, which filed a "friend of the court" (amicus) brief in the case and is the only group focused on the rape of confined persons, estimates that 290,000 boys and men are sexually assaulted in American jails, prisons, and juvenile institutions every year. Most of these, according to SPR, are young, nonviolent, and inexperienced at confinement life. The estimate is an extrapolation from previously published surveys.


"It is fitting that this decision should be handed down on the 50th anniversary of D-Day, for it marks our first beachhead established on a continent of tyrannical brutality, and opens the way for armies of lawyers to follow," said Stephen Donaldson, president of the New York-based organization. "The Court has given a green light to the legal invasion. The rest of this war will be protracted, and liberators will meet delays, local defeats, and counteroffensives, but ultimately we shall be victorious," he said.


"This is the first time the Supreme Court has directly addressed prisoner rape," Donaldson, who testified at a Massachusetts legislative hearing on prison rape on May 23, commented. Retiring Justice Blackmun noted in a concurring opinon: "The horrors experienced by many young inmates, particuarly those who...are convicted of nonviolent offenses, border on the unimaginable. Prison rape not only threatens the lives of those who fall prey to their aggressors, but is potentially devastating to the human spirit. Shame, depression, and a shattering loss of self-esteem, accompany the perpetual terror the victim thereafter must endure."


Donaldson also cited a May 17 Boston Globe poll of 400 registered voters in Massachusetts which found that 62% were concerned about prison rape, 59% agreed that being raped in prison is a violation of Eighth Amendment rights, 78% felt the state should make an effort to prevent prison rape, and 73% favored the distribution of condoms in prisons.


The SPR head, himself a survivor of jailhouse gang-rape following an arrest at a Quaker antiwar pray-in on the White House lawn, pointed to these significant developments in the Court's decision, written by Justice Souter:


The Court's focus shifted significantly from suits for damages following an actual rape to requests for injunctions by prisoners "incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of serious harm" as a result of the indifference of confinement officials. The emphasis on "conditions" and especially the use of "substantial" rather than a stronger term were significant signposts, Donaldson said.


The Court explicitly recognized that particular groups of prisoners ("all prisoners in his situation") could face a hightened risk of sexual assault and could sue for protective measures on that basis, rather than having to show vulnerability "for reasons personal to" the complainant.


The Court recognized the need for officials to take affirmative action rather than stand by and "let the state of nature take its course." As Justice Blackmun characterized it in his concurring opinion, the Court "sends a clear message to prison officials that their affirmative duty...is not to be taken lightly."


The Court explicitly linked its decision on prisoner rape to its 1993 decision in Helling v. McKinney affirming injunctive relief from risk of exposure to "infectious diseases" (a matter of the highest urgency for prisoner rapes in the age of AIDS), citing the Helling standard allowing injunctions even though the "possible infection might not affect all of those exposed" to the unconstitutional risk. "The National Prison Project, arguing for the petitioner in this case, did not discuss the fatal risk of AIDS to the victims of prisoner rape," said Donaldson, "but we did."


The Court let stand the naming of the director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons as a defendant in the case, thus encouraging future lawsuits to target system-wide policies responsible for prisoner rape.


The Court resolutely pronounced that prisoner rape "serves no `legitimate penological objective,' cannot be squared with "evolving standards of decency" and "is simply not `part of the penalty.'"


The Court held the door open for juries to draw inferences as to the state of mind of confinement officials from the "obviousness" of a risk, circumstantial evidence, and patterns of "longstanding, pervasive," or "well-documented" abuse. By allowing such evidence to be presented to a jury, the Court has made summary dismissals much more unlikely, aided the discovery process, and brought the darkest corners of administrative abuse and neglect into the disinfecting sunlight of a public trial.


The Court firmly rejected any absolute requirement of "advance notification" to prison officials of the danger.


"The Court disposed of the narrow legal arguments by both parties to the case and turned its attention to the systematic pattern of abuses documented in our amicus brief and the need for injunctive relief to combat them," said Donaldson. The approach taken by the National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the prisoner (urging the court to apply the Canton v. Harris civil law standard of "deliberate indifference" or a "should have known" test) did not convince the Court, he said, but our brief apparently did.


Donaldson said the Court seemed far more favorably disposed towards lawsuits seeking changes in institutional practices and policies through injunctions than it was towards those seeking money awards for past rapes. "The hurdles maintained by the Court for those who must prove the past states of knowledge of officials are not much of a problem for those seeking to change future behavior," he said.


"One major flaw in this decision with respect to damages is sure to return the problem to the Court eventually," Donaldson said. "There is a glaring contradiction between a problem which has been characterized by nearly universal denial, even a refusal by top prison officials to learn about it, on the one hand, and the Court's emphasis on proving subjective knowledge of the risk by those same officials on the other. To some extent, the Court seems to be encouraging the typical ostrich-like behavior by officials, which by refusing to acknowledge it perpetuates this horror, and I am certain that will come back to haunt the Court. You do not solve a problem by rewarding those who refuse to learn anything about it."


Another problem, he said, was the invitation to judges to require prisoners to first follow "adequate prison procedures to resolve inmate grievances." This can take many months, he said, during which prisoners can be raped and infected with AIDS.


Donaldson called on lawyers and prisoners around the country to enlist in a "moral crusade" to end what he termed "institutionalized torture." (Justice Blackmun also called the system of prison rape "nothing less than torture.") He said SPR was forming a legal committee to inform and assist attorneys and prisoners working on prisoner rape suits, giving highest priority to those requesting systematic injunctive relief along the lines outlined in its amicus brief. He said that Annapolis attorney Frank Dunbaugh had done "an outstanding job" in presenting the organization's "Brandeis"-type brief to the Court. A "Brandeis" brief generally seeks to outline widely accepted facts about a general situation to the court, avoiding the specific facts of the case, but providing a general factual background against which the Court can measure the effects of its decision.


In the specific case before the Court, Dee Farmer's suit against the federal prison system, which had been dismissed out of hand by the lower courts, was sent back to the district court with instructions to proceed with discovery and to apply the Court's new standards.


Update February 25, 1997 Copies of the SPR amicus brief are available, while supplies last, for $6. For further information contact: Don Collins, President SPR, 333 North Ave 61 #4 . Los Angeles, CA 90042 (213) 257-6164
[ Ajouter un commentaire ] [ Aucun commentaire ]

# Posté le dimanche 16 septembre 2007 18:40

Modifié le lundi 17 septembre 2007 00:32

my father and me in the swwiming pool

my father and me in the swwiming pool




----You have to read this it is absolutely beautiful......



Each year he sent her roses,
and the note would always say,
I love you even more this year,
than last year on this day.
My love for you will always grow,
with every passing year."




She knew this was the last time
that the roses would appear.
She thought, he ordered roses
in advance before this day.
Her loving husband did not know,
that he would pass away.




He always liked to do things early,
way before the time.
Then, if he got too busy,
everything would work out fine.




She trimmed the stems and
placed them in a very special vase.
Then, sat the vase beside
the portrait of his smiling face.




She would sit for hours,
In her husband's favorite chair.
While staring at his picture,
and the roses sitting there.




A year went by, and it was
to live without her mate.
With loneliness and solitude,
that had become her fate.




Then, the very hour,
The doorbell rang, and there
were roses sitting by her door.




She brought the roses in,
and then just looked at them in shock.
Then, went to get the telephone,
to call the florist shop.




The owner answered, and she asked him,
if he would explain, Why would someone would
do this to her, causing her such pain?




"I know your husband passed away,
more than a year ago,"
The owner said,
"I knew you'd call, and you would want to know.
The flowers you received today,
were paid for in advance.
Your husband always planned ahead,
he left nothing to chance.
There is a standing order,
that I have on file down here,
And he has paid, well in advance,
you'll get them every year.




There also is another thing,
that I think you should know,
He wrote a special little card...he did this years ago.
Then, should ever I find out that he's no longer here, that's the card that should be sent to you
the following year."

She thanked him and hung up the phone, her tears now flowing hard.
Her fingers shaking,
as she slowly reached to get the card.

Inside the card, she saw that he had written her a note.
Then, as she stared in total silence,
this is what he wrote...

"Hello my love, I know it's been a year
since I've been gone.
I hope it hasn't been too hard for you to overcome.
I know it must be lonely,
and the pain is very real.

Or if it was the other way,
I know how I would feel.
The love we shared made everything
so beautiful in life.
I loved you more than words can say,
you were the perfect wife.
You were my friend and lover,
you fulfilled my every need.
I know it's only been a year,
but please try not to grieve.

I want you to be happy,
even when you shed your tears.
That is why the roses will be sent to you for years.
When you get these roses,
think of all the happiness that we had together,
and how both of us were blessed.
I have always loved you and
I know I always will.
But, my love, you must go on,
you have some living still.

Please...try to find happiness,
while living out your days.
I know it is not easy,
but I hope you find some ways.

The roses will come every year,
and they will only stop,
When your door's not answered,
when the florist stops to knock.
He will come five times that day,
in case you have gone out.
But after his last visit,
he will know without a doubt!
To take the roses to the place,
where I've instructed him
and place the roses where we are,
together once again.

Sometimes in life, you find a special friend;
Someone who changes your life
just by being part of it.
Someone who makes you laugh
until you can't stop;
Someone who makes you believe
that there really is good in the world.
Someone who convinces you
that there really is an unlocked door
just waiting for you to open it.

This is Forever Friendship.
This is the sacred RED ROSE.
You MUST pass this rose on to at least 5 people within the hour of receiving this rose.
After you do, make a wish.
If you have passed it on, your wish will come true and love will come your wayshortly.
If not your life will stay the same as it has always been.
Just be nice & pass it on....May we all be loved so much.

Friend if I don't get this back I can take a hint!
How many people actually have 8 true friends? Hardly anyone I know! But some ofus have all right friends and good friends!!!

You have been Tagged by the YELLOW bird!
Which means you are a great friend!!
Send this to 8 people or more and if this is sent back to you then you know that you are a true friend

# Posté le lundi 03 septembre 2007 16:59

this is me

this is me
Explore Good Words and Love Poetry from the pen of a SOULMATE
This site is
intended to be a

source of friendship ......POETRY

and comfort; of spirituality ......Prayer

and exploration; an oasis in ......Meditation

this frantic and cruel world...... ......NEXT....GO DIRECT TO LINKS....TO FUN AND FOOD ROOM....Buddy's Site ....Saint Mary's site....Film and tv scripts

CLICK FOR SPOKEN POETRY....Prayer ....Meditation....Helpline links
IF YOU EXPERIENCE TEMPORARY SPEED LOADING PROBLEMS ON THE SPOKEN POETRY FILES PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR MIRROR SITE STREAMING POETRY PAGES

It is not meant to be exclusively Christian but of course , as this has been our route to spiritual development, there is an obvious bias......If you would like to see other sources and quotes added that have become special to you in your journey please please send them so that we can all move further along the path.We of the Book (Jew,Moslem,Christian) share the same Father God, but the essential differences between spiritual peoples is the direction we come from and the terrain our path winds through to our desired destination point in the arms of a loving Creator......A shared loving Creator well able to welcome us all as lost children returned to His loving arms......ABOVE ALL
RELAX....EXPLORE....TAKE COMFORT....ENJOY!!!

# Posté le vendredi 31 août 2007 12:03